File #: BC 21-017    Version: 1 Name:
Type: Commission Item Status: Passed
File created: 10/11/2021 In control: Heritage Preservation Commission
On agenda: 10/14/2021 Final action: 10/14/2021
Title: Public Hearing for Consideration of a Certificate of Appropriateness for the Proposed Demolition of 212 Division St. S. - Archer House.
Attachments: 1. 1 - Public Hearing Notice & Location Map

Date:                                          October 14, 2021

 

To:                                          Members of the Heritage Preservation Commission

 

From:                                          Mikayla Schmidt, City Planner                     

 

Title

Public Hearing for Consideration of a Certificate of Appropriateness for the Proposed Demolition of 212 Division St. S. - Archer House.

 

Body

Action Requested:                     

The Heritage Preservation Commission is asked to conduct a public hearing to gather input on the requested Certificate of Appropriateness for the Proposed Demolition of 212 Division St. S. - Archer House.

 

Summary Report:

Manawa, LLC has applied for a certificate of appropriateness (COA) to demolition 212 Division St. S. - Archer House.

 

Public hearing notices were mailed to property owners within 350’ of 212 Division St. S. on September 30, 2021. A copy of the public hearing mailing and location map are attached. The public hearing notice was published in the Northfield News on Wednesday, September 29, 2021.

 

The following is the procedure of the public hearing per the City Council’s adopted Rules of Business:

Public Hearing Procedure:

A Public Hearing is used to solicit the public's comments on various projects or City operation procedures.

 

A. The Chair will open the hearing by identifying the subject.

 

B. Staff Presentation - staff will give a presentation on the subject.

 

C. Applicant's Presentation - if needed.

 

D. Public Input - The public will have the opportunity to speak for or against the issue. The public may ask questions, make comments, voice support, agree or disagree with the issue.

 

1. The Chair will recognize a speaker and comments/conversation will be between the Chair and speaker; and between the Chair and Commissioners.

 

2. The speaker must give their name, address, and if representing a business, must give the name of the business or corporation. If an Attorney or consultant is representing a client, the client must be identified for the record.

 

3. Speakers will be allowed to speak a maximum of two (2) minutes per item (not including interpreter’s time).

 

E. Questions or Clarifications from the Heritage Preservation Commission - After the public input of the public hearing is completed, the Heritage Preservation Commission may request questions or clarifications prior to closing the public hearing. This section will be used when there are questions related to the topic on which the public hearing is being held. Questions should be succinct and avoid being rhetorical or leading in nature. Subsequent actions of the Heritage Preservation Commission provide for opportunities for further questions or clarifications from the Planning Commission.

 

F. Any material to be entered into the record shall be noted. Any written communication presented to the Heritage Preservation Commission during a Heritage Preservation Commission meeting shall be read into the record or summarized for the record or simply delivered to the Heritage Preservation Commission, as the Heritage Preservation Commission may determine. They shall then be recorded in the minutes by title and filed with the minutes.

 

G. Motion to Close Hearing - The Chair will state if there is an extension of time for public input into the hearing. If not, the Heritage Preservation Commission will make a motion, second, and vote on closing the public hearing.

 

City Planner Mikayla Schmidt will be giving a presentation on the certificate of appropriateness request. The relevant background materials and information for this item are included in the agenda item immediately following the public hearing to consider action on the application. There will not be a separate staff presentation for that agenda item and there will not be separate testimony for that for the applicant or public at that time.

 

Alternative Options:

NA

 

Financial Impacts:                     

NA

 

Tentative Timelines:                     

NA