File #: 19-677    Version: 1 Name:
Type: Motion Status: Passed
File created: 12/27/2018 In control: City Council
On agenda: 1/22/2019 Final action: 1/22/2019
Title: Consider Approval of 2019 City Administrator Performance Evaluation Process.
Attachments: 1. 1- Cost Estimate from B Strandell CA Performance Review 2019
City Council Meeting Date: January 22, 2019

To: Mayor and City Council
City Administrator

From: Communications & Human Resources Director Michelle Mahowald

Title
Consider Approval of 2019 City Administrator Performance Evaluation Process.

Body
Action Requested:
The Northfield City Council considers a motion approving the 2019 City Administrator Performance Evaluation Process recommended by the Council Employment Policy Committee.

Summary Report:
The Council Employment Policy Committee recommends the following timeline and process facilitated by third party consultant Barbara Strandell, What Works Inc.

This Performance Review Tool:
1. Is a retrospective evaluation of how well the City Administrator has performed his duties, achieved established goals and priorities, and demonstrated proficiency or acumen in the core competencies adopted by the Mayor and City Council.
2. Is forward looking: what would you like the City Administrator to accomplish and focus on over the next review period.
3. The complete review contains three major components: City Council Review, City Administrator Self-Assessment and Staff Input.
_________

City Administrator Performance Review Tool
Will be delivered on Survey Monkey
I. City Council
Part A: Achievements
A. From your viewpoint, what are the significant accomplishments or achievements made by your City Administrator in the last year?
B. In your opinion, how effective has the City Administrator been in addressing or responding to key City Council priorities and issues?
_____ Exceptional _____Very Effective _____ Meets Expectations _____Below Expectations
Explain:


Part B: Core Competencies
On a 3-part scale (Exceeds, Meets, Below Expectations)
E - Exceeds Expectations: Performance exceeds requirements for major standards
M -Meets Expectations: Results meet requirements and are satisfactory
B - Below Expectations: Performance needs improvement; results are acceptable but not satisfactory

A. Personal...

Click here for full text