Skip to main content
City of Northfield MN
File #: 24-598    Version: 1 Name:
Type: Information/Discussion Item Status: Agenda Ready
File created: 9/12/2024 In control: Heritage Preservation Commission
On agenda: 9/30/2024 Final action:
Title: Discussion of Text Amendments Related to Sign Regulations in the Historic-Overlay District in Chapter 34 - Land Development Code of the Northfield City Code.
Attachments: 1. 1 - ORDINANCE 1067- Alternative 1, 2. 2 - ORDINANCE 1067- Alternative 2, 3. 3 - ORDINANCE 1067- Alternative 3, 4. 4 - Resolution HPC #2024-009, 5. 5 - Presentation, 6. 6 - Select Excerpts from Comparable Cities' Sign Codes, 7. 7 - Historic Photos, 8. 8 - Hyperlink to 8/7/24 HPC Meeting, 9. 9 - Hyperlink to 8/15/24 PC Meeting
Date Ver.Action ByActionResultAction DetailsMeeting DetailsVideo
No records to display.
Heritage Preservation Meeting Date: September 30, 2024

To: Members of the Heritage Preservation Commission

From: Mathias Hughey, Associate City Planner

Title
Discussion of Text Amendments Related to Sign Regulations in the Historic-Overlay District in Chapter 34 - Land Development Code of the Northfield City Code.

Body
Action Requested:
The Heritage Preservation Commission is asked to provide comments following the Planning Commission recommendations regarding proposed text amendments to the City Code related to sign regulations in the Historic-Overlay District.

Summary Report:
Following the Heritage Preservation Commission's (HPC) August request to the Planning Commission (PC) to consider proposed text amendments to the portions of the City Code related to signs within the Historic-Overlay (H-O) district, the PC made a recommendation to City Council to consider an ordinance adopting similar text amendments.

The PC made two substantial changes to the draft amendments provided by the HPC as part of their recommendation. The first was to remove the limit of four (4) colors of sign text. The second was to classify Certificates of Appropriateness (COA) for signs as Minor Work, subject to approval by City Staff as opposed to full HPC approval.

City Staff originally planned to present three versions of the ordinance to the City Council. Alternative 3 retains the HPC review of signs, the 4-color limit for text, and the ban on fluorescent colors. Alternative 2 retains the HPC review of signs but removes the 4-color limit for text and the ban on fluorescent colors. Alternative 1 classifies signs as Minor Work and removes the 4-color limit and ban on fluorescent colors.

The mayor requested that HPC review the PC recommendation before the City Council considers the matter. Staff will create a supplemental memo to the City Council so they can review the discussion of tonight's HPC meeting.

Staff Recommendation:
City staff recommends the adoption of Alternat...

Click here for full text