Legislation Details

File #: 26-460    Version: 1 Name:
Type: Information/Discussion Item Status: Agenda Ready
File created: 12/17/2025 In control: Charter Commission
On agenda: 9/10/2026 Final action:
Title: Consider Proposed Amendment to Charter Section 3.4 Incompatible Offices.
Attachments: 1. 1 - City Attorney Memo re. Charter Section 3.4 Amendment v.3 7.28.26, 2. 2 - Ordinance Charter Section 3.4 - Exhibit A v.pdf, 3. 3 - Ordinance Charter Section 3.4 - Exhibit B v.pdf, 4. 4 - Ordinance Charter Section 3.4 - Exhibit C v.pdf, 5. 5 - Charter Amendment Process and Timeline, 6. 6 - 09-10-26 Proposed Charter Amendment Presentation
Date Ver.Action ByActionResultAction DetailsMeeting DetailsVideo
No records to display.
Charter Commission Meeting Date: September 10, 2026

To: Chair and Members of the Charter Commission

From: Ben Martig, City Administrator

Title
Consider Proposed Amendment to Charter Section 3.4 Incompatible Offices.

Body
Action Requested:
The Northfield Charter Commission is asked to consider a proposed amendment to Charter Section 3.4 Incompatible Offices.

Summary Report:
The Charter Commission is asked to consider amendments to Charter Section 3.4 Incompatible Offices. Section 3.4 currently restricts elected City officers from being employed by the City or holding another City office during their term and for one year following the expiration of their term. Exact wording is as follows:

Section 3.4. - Incompatible Offices.
An elected officer of the city may not be appointed administrator, hold any other city office nor be employed by the city in any other capacity for pay; nor for a period of one year after expiration of the officer's term of office, hold a city office nor be employed by the city for pay.

The City Administrator has identified this section of the Charter as an area that may not align with state statues and requested a review from the City Attorney. A City Attorney memo is attached (attachment 1) and identifies concerns with the current language and recommends it be amended. The City Attorney concludes that the one-year restriction on a former elected officer holding another City office is likely unconstitutional and recommends its removal. The memorandum also discusses potential concerns regarding the one-year waiting period for City employment and presents several options for the Charter Commission’s consideration.

The attached memorandum includes three draft amendment options:
Amend Section 3.4 to restate the applicable state law regarding employment restrictions.
Amend Section 3.4 to incorporate the applicable state law by reference.
Amend Section 3.4 to remove the restriction regarding holding another City office without addr...

Click here for full text